REVIEWER HONOR ROLL

LAST MONTH'S NOMINEES (IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER)

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: Lights by J Westlake
Submitted by: J Westlake
Nominator's Comments: Pointed out an important flaw, identifying how to make the protagonist more likeable. This is what was holding back the story, in my opinion.

Reviewer: Lindsay B
Submission: Wynnstalkicinkeur The Imp Chapter 19 *Adult Only* by Jeanne Marcella
Submitted by: Jeanne Marcella
Nominator's Comments: Lindsay's original review forced me to rewrite this chapter. I was thrilled and surprised with the revised result. A supporting character I was pushing off into the background actually changed the flow of the plot for the better. Thanks Lindsay!

Reviewer: Dy Loveday
Submission: The Last Immortal: IV (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Dy has a keen insight in her reviews. Always willing to tell it like it is, but also praising the author where she feels they deserve it. Just what I need.

Reviewer: Marc D
Submission: The Last Immortal: IV (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Marc is a new reviewer for me, but he gives a top-notch review. fair and unbiased. I like that.

Reviewer: Cynthia Wright
Submission: The Last Immortal: IV (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Cynthia's reviews are always spot-on, chock-full of praise and dead-on insights on where my work needs further re-visioning. She always seems to be having a ball reviewing my work, and it makes me feel good that she is having fun reading my chapters. And since she is a fine writer in her own right, her reviews mean that much more to me.

Reviewer: Tim Brommer
Submission: The Last Immortal: Chapter III (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Tim always has a keen eye for detail in his reviews. And that is what ALL writers need.

Reviewer: Benjamin Gibbs-Churchley
Submission: Whispers of a Storm Book 1 Chapter 1 by Italo Samano
Submitted by: Italo Samano
Nominator's Comments: The reviewer impressed me with their attention to pertinent details while maintaining a air of respect for the piece. More importantly, when and where the reviewer found flaws he went further to explain why as well as suggest a way it could be fixed.

Reviewer: Miquela Faure
Submission: Encrypted -- Chapter 8 by Lindsay B
Submitted by: Lindsay B
Nominator's Comments: Miquela is a wonderful reviewer, and it's an honor having her read my chapters. You can count on her to pick up on the subtle hints you're trying to give the reader, and she's great at putting a thumb on things that you know are off, but you're not sure just how. ;) I've seen her return hasty two-paragraph crits with thoughtful pages-long reviews. She's an asset to the workshop!

Reviewer: Becca Andre
Submission: Encrypted -- Chapter 8 by Lindsay B
Submitted by: Lindsay B
Nominator's Comments: Becca has a great sense of humor (just read her stuff!), and she can make you laugh even as she's offering suggestions. And she's a chemist in real life, so she can give you all sorts of good ideas if you have characters interested in blowing things up on a regular basis (all kinds of fun, there!).

Reviewer: michael keyton
Submission: The Gremio Inheritance Chapter 32 by Ann Winter
Submitted by: Ann Winter
Nominator's Comments: Mike always works hard and consistently on my reviews. He seems to have an awareness of what I'm trying to achieve, and knows how to develop it. He's tactful, but blunt where necessary. In this particular chapter, he's shown me exactly how to develop it in a way that's cosistent with what I'm trying to achieve. It's impossible to teach a person something before they are at the developmetal point to receive it and through many chapters Mike has been very patient with my stubbornness.

Reviewer: Michael Goodwin
Submission: Coy, Ch 5 overhauled, C4C w/summary by Lindy Kilby
Submitted by: Lindy Kilby
Nominator's Comments: Mike pointed out great ways to strengthen the chapter in a constructive way. He gives a very thorough and helpful crit.

Reviewer: Free Falconer
Submission: Kulusi by Joseph Ahn
Submitted by: Joseph Ahn
Nominator's Comments: Very in-depth and thoughtful. Free Falconer clearly put a lot of genuine thought and effort into the review, and thus it has a lot of substantive content and analysis. One of the best reviews I have yet received.

Reviewer: Sage V Jorran
Submission: Seeming (Ch. 1B - Scott & Tammy) by Corven Winters
Submitted by: Corven Winters
Nominator's Comments: Sage Jorran knows how to give review. Not jut from a writer's standpoint, but also from the standpoint of a READER. Sage is a true READER, the kind of person that every writer hopeful should want to review their piece. He gave praise in a way that was encouraging without being fawning. He criticized justly, directly, and didn't tread on eggshells. He showed me which of my darlings needed to be heartlessly murdered and critiqued both my prose and story structure in equal measure. The references he offered me were many and I received the impression that he analyzed my work carefully and with the same care that I employed in writing it - possibly a little more than it was worth. Overall, he reviews from an audience's point of view: a story can be moving, beautifully written, and soundly structured, but if it's not entertaining, no one is going to read it. Sage understands this. I've received many reviews of my writing over the years from different websites and readers. Sage's review was among the best I've received.

Reviewer: L. David Holbrook Jr
Submission: Crazy Train, Ch 12 by chris casey
Submitted by: chris casey
Nominator's Comments: It had some humour in it which I appreciate, and it's the second time this reviewer has given me a crit. So, I'm getting a following on the internet. And he doesn't require me to return the crit, which I am sometimes in to big a hurry to do.

Reviewer: Corven Winters
Submission: Coy, Ch 8, C4C w/ summary by Lindy Kilby
Submitted by: Lindy Kilby
Nominator's Comments: Corven has great insight and gives a very thorough crit. His thoughts are right on target.

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: Pixie story (part 1) by Suzanne McLeod
Submitted by: Suzanne McLeod
Nominator's Comments: Very helpful review with some insightful comments, thank you.

Reviewer: Becca Andre
Submission: Don't Mind the Minders by Amy Burzynski
Submitted by: Amy Burzynski
Nominator's Comments: All your reviews are very helpful--thank you!

Reviewer: Steve Brady
Submission: Don't Mind the Minders by Amy Burzynski
Submitted by: Amy Burzynski
Nominator's Comments: All your reviews are very helpful--thank you!

Reviewer: Marc D
Submission: The Last Immortal: VII (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Marc always does a marvelous job at critting my work. He has not only a keen eye, but helpful tidbits of writing acumen that I find refreshing.

Reviewer: Dead Girls Can't Tell Part1
Submission: L. David Holbrook Jr by Anita Stewart
Submitted by: Anita Stewart
Nominator's Comments: I found his review helpful.

Reviewer: Jeanne Haskin
Submission: Widdershins part 2 partial and others. by elizabeth hull
Submitted by: elizabeth hull
Nominator's Comments: Jeanne has an eye for plot and detail. She has given me enormous help with this and other submissions. I get to know if the story is working and this is a huge blessing.

Reviewer: elizabeth hull
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Elizabeth is one of the most fierce, honest, dedicated reviewers I have. She loves my work, will not take anything less than the best I can give, and prods me constantly to keep going. It's a lucky thing to have a encouraging, knowledgeable reviewer like her cross your path. But her true value lies in the loyal friendship she offers to those she meets along the way. I would not be the write I am without her.

Reviewer: Stelios Touchtidis
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Stelios is a gift I never dreamed to receive. His writing alone is so captivating, energetic and original--and yet so clearly backed by real heart and the soul of true romantic--that the joy of reading it would be worth striking up a crit relationship in and of itself. However, Stelios has never failed to give some of my most thoughtful, eagle-eyed, encouraging crits. That he continues to do this even in the midst of his own personal battles is truly remarkable. He is one in a million.

Reviewer: Marlene Dotterer
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Marlene has recently become a regular critter of mine and I thank my lucky stars she stuck around. Her style is gentle but firm, honest and encouraging. She never fails to point out where I've gone right as often as where I've gone wrong, and that is a skill that few reviewers master. This thanks has been long overdue.

Reviewer: Gio Clairval (SfF)
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Although I crit her less often than I would like, I have to admit that every time is a pleasure. An even bigger pleasure is when this perceptive and intelligent critter drops by to honour me with a crit of her own. There is a reason she is one of the top critters on this site and it has everything to do with her ability to get right to the heart of a post and yet appreciate its whole. Thank you for critting me, Gio.

Reviewer: David Fortier
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: David is one my regular cheerleaders, a newbie who grew so quickly in craft and crit ability that he ceased to be a newbie long ago ::grin:: He keeps me on my toes, is always prodding for my next chapter (he knows I procrastinate dreadfully sometimes) and then will crit with great enthusiasm and honesty. I appreciate every bit of advice he delivers. And thank god he dropped by to remind me that swords do not make shrill noises when they are drawn ::Grin::

Reviewer: Christine Lucas
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Christine alone is a wonderful new crit partner in my group, but her true value to me is Mr. Kitten, her perceptive cat. Without his guidance, certain sections of my present WIP would be lacking that feline touch. I am grateful for both their enthusiastic and dead-on reviews, but I must admit I keep catnip on hand for my favourite reviewer :-)

Reviewer: dena landon Stoll
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 21 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Dena has been a steadfast and thoughtful critter, even though she is so busy and is working so hard on her own amazing YA WIP. I look forward to her crits, and her perceptiveness is a rare gift. Few people so easily get what a writer is going for. Thank you so much for every crit you have done for me.

Reviewer: Walter Williams
Submission: Hand of Gaia - Part 23 (TRT) by Rhonda S. Garcia
Submitted by: Rhonda S. Garcia
Nominator's Comments: Walter dropped by and gave me one of those quick encouraging reviews that can make a writer's day. Although he doesn't know it, he helped confirm for me whether my synopsis and writing was working, even for someone dropping in in the middle. I am grateful for this in ways I cannot express. Few reviewers are willing to read when a WIP has reached as far as mine, and sometimes you need that new voice to let you know your regular critters aren't just handing the reins of trust over to you. Thank you, Walt.

Reviewer: Simon Rhodes
Submission: Y Ddraig Goch - The Red Dragon: Chapter 1 by Joy Ball
Submitted by: Joy Ball
Nominator's Comments: Simon did an excellent review, explaining everything and and WHY! A very helpful review!

Reviewer: Sarah Pinsker
Submission: Tfoo by Kate Kanno
Submitted by: Kate Kanno
Nominator's Comments: One the most helpful reviews I've received. Wonderful suggestions and criticisms.

Reviewer: Ilan Lerman
Submission: morvern peak (working title) ch1 by Georgina Bruce
Submitted by: Georgina Bruce
Nominator's Comments: He saw what I was attempting to do with the piece, and was able to comment intelligently on that. He knows what he's talking about and I trust his opinions. A lot of my reviews were kind of negative, but Ilan always looks for the positives, and in my opinion that makes him a great reviewer.

Reviewer: April Grey
Submission: On Mars, at Night by Christine Lucas
Submitted by: Christine Lucas
Nominator's Comments: April's reviews are always helpful and insightful, but this one gets extra credit for her title suggestions. When I posted my story I had no idea of a fitting title, and April gave me five great ones to choose from. Thank you!

Reviewer: L. David Holbrook Jr
Submission: 'ASSASSIN - CH 3' by Katie Samson
Submitted by: Katie Samson
Nominator's Comments: David picked up on what I was trying to achieve and offered very helpful advice on how to improve towards that goal.

Reviewer: Marlene Dotterer
Submission: Assassin's Gambit, chapter 10 by Amy Burzynski
Submitted by: Amy Burzynski
Nominator's Comments: All your reviews are excellent and very helpful!

Reviewer: Melina Vray
Submission: Magic of the Frogs by Joseph Marro
Submitted by: Joseph Marro
Nominator's Comments: As i stated in my profile that this is my first attempt at a children's book and i am learning alot about writing as I go. Melina is very candid on her review which will only help me perfect my writing. I have not edited this as of yet and she has brought to light some changes I need to make. This is exactly why I signed up here. Thank you.

Reviewer: Amy Paul
Submission: The Last Immortal: IX (C4C) by Michael Goodwin
Submitted by: Michael Goodwin
Nominator's Comments: Amy is not only a gifted writer, but she is also a gifted reviewer. She has great insights into what could make any particular chapter even better, with minute details I might've forgotten. Amy has a sharp eye for detail.

Reviewer: Sarah Gilman
Submission: Encrypted -- Chapter 9 by Lindsay B
Submitted by: Lindsay B
Nominator's Comments: I'm as likely to get myself in trouble with logic issues as with writing. I put out the request for chemistry help with this chapter, and Sarah was able to point out some of the boo-boos that I'll have to address. Much appreciated, thanks!

Reviewer: Marc D
Submission: Encrypted -- Chapter 11 by Lindsay B
Submitted by: Lindsay B
Nominator's Comments: Marc is good about pointing out logic issues and reminding me to follow up on things mentioned in earlier chapters. Thanks!

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: Untitled by Jodi Henry
Submitted by: Jodi Henry
Nominator's Comments: She offered great insights into what was missing in the story.

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: The Venom of Vipers - Ch2 by KC May
Submitted by: KC May
Nominator's Comments: She told me where things weren't working and why, while still being constructive. Good crit.

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: "The Hunt" by meham
Submitted by: melanie hamilton
Nominator's Comments: Georgina focused my attention on the effect of the backstory on the flow of the narrative. She saw clearly through my lovely language and setting and nailed me on motivation, character, and how much I should know as the writer and how much I am revealing to the reader. All in all, I think I have a much shorter story here. Keeping Georgina's critique in mind, shorter will be much better. She has seen the weeds my friends have missed.

Reviewer: Sean Eret
Submission: "The Hunt" by meham
Submitted by: melanie hamilton
Nominator's Comments: It hadn't occurred to me that assembling a radio would be considered "underwater basketweaving". Sean's comment revealed an attitude and knowledge of radio that I hadn't considered. Just because _I_ understood the importance of what's called a Foxhunt in ham radio circles, doesn't mean that anyone else would. Without that information, the story really doesn't matter. The why of the piece is missing. Thank, Sean.

Reviewer: Katherine Hartwig
Submission: The Bearer- Chp. 21 by Jodi Henry
Submitted by: Jodi Henry
Nominator's Comments: I feel like this nomination is happening three chapters too late. My fault. After a month long vacation from OWW Katherine has returned and her critiques have gotten better with each one she's done for me. She hits on all my author queries and finds the good, the bad and the ugly in each submission but always with tact. With faults she offers explanations and suggestions for revisions and they're always great.

Reviewer: David Emanuel
Submission: The art of flying by Georgina Bruce
Submitted by: Georgina Bruce
Nominator's Comments: David provided a helpful balance between giving a general overview and pointing out specific problems in the text.

Reviewer: elizabeth hull
Submission: The art of flying by Georgina Bruce
Submitted by: Georgina Bruce
Nominator's Comments: Elizabeth reviews are always very clear, and there is always something useful to take away from them. In this case, she flagged up an issue with the story that needed to be resolved, so that helps a lot.

Reviewer: Swapna Kishore
Submission: The art of flying by Georgina Bruce
Submitted by: Georgina Bruce
Nominator's Comments: Swapna looked at the inconsistencies in the plot and helped me identify areas that needed a bit of logical underpinning. This was really helpful!

Reviewer: Kim J Zimring
Submission: The art of flying by Georgina Bruce
Submitted by: Georgina Bruce
Nominator's Comments: Kim pointed out some larger plot problems as well as smaller nits to be resolved. This helped me work out how to approach the second draft.

Reviewer: Georgina Bruce
Submission: Meridien- Chapter One by Cat Torres V
Submitted by: Cat Torres V
Nominator's Comments: This review was excellent. It also focused on issues that I needed advice and input on, such as structuring the story and limiting exposition. Although I did not note it in my note to reviewers, I had gone through many versions on chapter order, etc, and Georgina's input helped me decide which structure to use. I adopted most of her comments and updated my submission accordingly. Many thanks, Georgina! I hope you'll review my next submissions as well!

Reviewer: Walter Williams
Submission: Where the Wild Things Are Chapter 7 synopsis included by elizabeth hull
Submitted by: elizabeth hull
Nominator's Comments: Dear Walt made the hugely important point that the word caste wouldn't have been used in the time of the character using that particular word as it didn't exist in the language then. This would have been a huge slip, so mega cudos to him for stopping me making a gaff. I am deeply grateful.

HOME | LOG IN/JOIN | READ, RATE, REVIEW | SUBMIT | YOUR INFO | YOUR LISTS | MEMBER DIRECTORY | LOG IN

HOW IT WORKS | FAQ | HOW TO REVIEW | NEWSLETTER / E-GROUPS | EDITORS' CHOICES
REVIEWER HONOR ROLL | HALL OF FAME | RESOURCES | E-MAIL US